Search found 300 matches

by Renée Bagslint
Wed Dec 12, 2018 4:39 pm
Forum: Wikimedia Foundation
Topic: WMF: we are the law
Replies: 2
Views: 84

WMF: we are the law

Katherine Maher now claims that Judge WMF is the law
Lol @ that since they’re probably in violation of our TOS which may itself be afoul of the CFAA.
(Which, of course, is a felony. So there you have it, crimes.)
by Renée Bagslint
Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:30 am
Forum: Wikimedia Foundation
Topic: Katherine Maher, executive director Wikimedia Foundation
Replies: 50
Views: 7441

Re: Katherine Maher, executive director Wikimedia Foundation

I doubt I will need to follow Katherine's Twitter feed any longer. She has literally(*) endorsed Satan. 'Nuff said.

(*) And by "literally" I literally mean "literally".
by Renée Bagslint
Sat Dec 01, 2018 9:31 pm
Forum: Wikimedia Foundation
Topic: Katherine Maher, executive director Wikimedia Foundation
Replies: 50
Views: 7441

Re: Katherine Maher, executive director Wikimedia Foundation

Oh dear, Katherine has blotted her copybook:
California mandates two-hour mandatory anti-harassment training. It's usually a bit of a bore
A bore? Surely not!
by Renée Bagslint
Wed Nov 21, 2018 9:54 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Editors is a dumb name
Replies: 5
Views: 303

Re: Editors is a dumb name

I have been using "contributor" for rather a long time now. It emphasises the fact that they are giving stuff to the WMF for free and getting next to nothing in return,
by Renée Bagslint
Mon Nov 19, 2018 7:50 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Suckswatch
Replies: 49
Views: 4441

Re: Suckswatch

EarlStatler wrote:
Sun Nov 18, 2018 11:40 pm
So, the only action can be hasten the day, and who is willing to hasten the day? It cost you a lot of time and maybe even money, and what do you get in return? Nothing. And that is the reason.
A fair, if depressing, summary.
by Renée Bagslint
Sun Nov 18, 2018 7:35 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Suckswatch
Replies: 49
Views: 4441

Re: Suckswatch

Graaf, I had originally hoped that discussion and analysis might eventually lead to action. But it's clear that no-one at any of the sites I've been watching shares that aspiration.
by Renée Bagslint
Sun Nov 11, 2018 6:11 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Suckswatch
Replies: 49
Views: 4441

Re: Suckswatch

Strelnikov points out in a thread I can't link to that it's all getting a bit pointless. I can only agree.
by Renée Bagslint
Fri Nov 02, 2018 8:48 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Wikipediocracy's failure is a joy to watch
Replies: 384
Views: 39126

Re: Wikipediocracy's failure is a joy to watch

I suppose it's helpful that Midsize Jake lays out the ground rules for WO's political stance so clearly. It was perhaps inevitable that the first rule of WO would be "Everything is Trump's fault" but perhaps a little more surprising that the second is "Only say nice things about George Soros" . Paul...
by Renée Bagslint
Mon Oct 29, 2018 7:49 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Wikipediocracy's failure is a joy to watch
Replies: 384
Views: 39126

Re: Wikipediocracy's failure is a joy to watch

By all means discuss GW's actions if you wish, although I believe there is another thread for that. My point was that WO denizens have conspicuously failed to take the opportunity to ask GW the key question: Do you think that you were right to ban someone summarily solely because you disapprove of t...