In-depth evaluation of specific Wikipedia articles.
Posts: 569
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2017 7:01 pm

Re: Patriarchy

Post by Proabivouac » Fri Jul 06, 2018 5:48 am

Kingsindian wrote:
Fri Jul 06, 2018 4:56 am
See the entry under "patriarchy" in the Concise Encyclopedia of Sociology. ... te_note-10
University of Alberta wrote: Michelle Meagher, PhD, MA, BA
Associate Professor, Associate Chair Undergraduate, Honors Advisor
Women's & Gender Studies ... le-meagher
Kingsindian wrote:
Fri Jul 06, 2018 4:56 am
For instance, the whole section dealing with "biological versus social theories" is absurd. ... l_theories
Wikipedia POV pushers wrote: As a common standard of differentiation between sexes, advocates for a patriarchal society like to focus on the influences that hormones have over biological systems.[citation needed]
I've been championing patriarchal societies for years now and have honestly never thought about this. Massive portions of the section are completely unreferenced, and nearly all of it is basically irrelevant to patriarchy. I would say that the right solution is to unceremoniously blank the whole thing, but then I'd probably say the same of the article as a whole. It's hideously bad work on just about every level. Better to have nothing and start again from scratch.

I'm disappointed that GorillaWarfare hasn't shown up to defend it. Isn't she an expert about everything related to gender?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests