Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2018 7:35 pm
Graaf, I had originally hoped that discussion and analysis might eventually lead to action. But it's clear that no-one at any of the sites I've been watching shares that aspiration.
The forum about wikis
Is Somey an antisemitic piece of shit who posts "Israel-related" threads and then uses them to attack Jews around the world, then disappears when he's called out?
well ultimately the wiki stuff is just not interesting enough and addicts have to get their dopamine hits from somewhere, so they turn to interpersonal conflict, also known as player vs. player or PvP. At that point the less repressed you are, the more you let loose and make a total jackass of yourself, the bigger deal you become.EarlStatler wrote: ↑Tue Nov 20, 2018 10:29 amSomey, what a joke. But you know, if you have a longer look at the fora you see always the same names. Now Guido den Broeder, the man with his own autists and Jahova wiki is popping up on WO. Prins Ogidius.
A wiki star out of the time of Oscar van Dillen, the famous Dutch composer nobody ever has heard about. Close related to Mdd. And in this way it is a continuing soap opera.
That is what they are doing now with there abitroll election, making a complete jackass out of themself. All, both the candidates as well as the voters. They simple don't deserve no to live in a free country, because they even doen't understand the base of democratie.Auggie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:08 pm
well ultimately the wiki stuff is just not interesting enough and addicts have to get their dopamine hits from somewhere, so they turn to interpersonal conflict, also known as player vs. player or PvP. At that point the less repressed you are, the more you let loose and make a total jackass of yourself, the bigger deal you become.
Despite his pledge to "respectfully disagree," JzG a.k.a. Guy Chapman a.k.a. Suzy Chapstick has been completely fanatical about both these points for many years now. CrowsNest has advanced the bizarre hypothesis (since deleted from the board) that WIkipedia is "homophobic" and looks to be saying the same of Mr. Chapman. One wonders just what would pass for non-homophobic in Mr. Nest's worldview. The Folsom Street Fair?CrowsNest wrote:The Supreme Court thinks it is a settled matter of civil rights, so how can you even begin to entertain it as merely an area where one can respectfully disagree? What other hard won civil rights are you not so sure about?JzG wrote: If you believe that marriage is between one man and one woman, I will respectfully disagreeSince the medical need for people to be able to make this choice is well established, it seems odd you still seem to think it is up for debate.JzG wrote: If you believe that a person should not choose to change the presenting gender of their body, I will respectfully disagree